In this poem, Wordsworth is asked why he sits on an old stone dreaming his time away. Wordsworth begins to reply, "The eye it cannot chuse but see,/ We cannot bid the ear be still;/ Our bodies feel, where'er they be,/ Against, or with our will." Here he tells Matthew of the senses that are stimulated while being surrounded by nature (whether one would like them to or not). Nature is something you can see, hear, touch, smell and taste. The imagination is stimulated by actual sensations happening to your body, and that is what Wordsworth is trying to explain to Matthew. Matthew believes knowledge through reading is more valuable. He might not understand until the end that when one's imagination is stimulated through text, no actual stimulants affect your body, except ones you could only imagine. What Wordsworth makes clear to the reader is that both the presence of nature and knowledge through text are both forms of dreaming, but the actual sensual stimulations received by nature cannot be reproduced in text. Therefore, dreaming in nature is more valuable.
Let's test Wordsworth's philosophy.
First, read this poem slowly and imagine what all five of your senses would be like if you were experiencing this for yourself.
Second, go outside, close your eyes, take a deep breath and take time to think about anything for a minute.
Which one is more stimulating to the sense? Which did you gain more from mentally? |
|
Good. I like the focus on the role of the senses. It's interesting that you tie the senses to imagination. Wouldn't we normally think imagination would be more engaged by reading? Books stimulate the "mind's eye" rather than the actual eye, right? This may be a contradiction in WW's argument, but its one you could address. What do you think?
ReplyDeleteThe distinction here is physical senses vs. mental (imaginary) senses. One would think that books would stimulate the mind more, when in fact it is actual sensations happening to the body that can't be replaced by one's imaginary sense. Books can only stimulate the mind's eye while nature can stimulate both the actual eye and the minds eye. I feel Wordsworth doesn't go deep enough as to explain this to the reader if this is what he is trying to convey.
ReplyDelete